Analysis of Pedestrian Facility Planning (Case Study of Peta Street in Bandung City)

Authors

  • Stefanus Sylvan Ryanto Politeknik Transportasi Darat Bali Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2504-833X
  • Hazen Putraditya Mochammad Politeknik Transportasi Darat Bali Author
  • A. A. Bagus Oka Khrisna Surya Politeknik Transportasi Darat Bali Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62554/3zg7jf37

Keywords:

Pedestrian Facilities, Sidewalk Planning, Pelican Crossing, PV², Pedestrian Safety

Abstract

The Peta Road corridor in Bandung City lacks adequate pedestrian facilities, particularly in front of SPBU 34-40256, despite the high intensity of pedestrian activities generated by nearby schools, industrial areas, and residential zones. This condition increases the risk of vehicle–pedestrian conflicts and is reflected in recurrent pedestrian-related accidents recorded during the 2019–2023 period. This study aims to plan appropriate pedestrian walking and crossing facilities based on actual demand to enhance pedestrian safety and comfort. The required sidewalk width was calculated using technical guidelines issued by the Ministry of Public Works and Housing, resulting in a theoretical width of approximately 1.1 m; however, an operational width of 1.5 m on both sides of the road is recommended to meet safety and accessibility standards. The peak pedestrian flow along the road segment reached 2.45 pedestrians/min on one side and 2.75 pedestrians/min on the opposite side. For crossing facilities, the peak crossing volume (P) was 191 pedestrians/hour and the peak traffic volume (V) was 6,103 vehicles/hour, producing a PV² value of 7.1 × 10⁹. Based on this value and site constraints, a pelican crossing is recommended as the most appropriate and technically justified pedestrian crossing facility for the study location.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmed, S., Hossain, S., Shaik, M. E., & Shakik, A. (2024). Evaluation of speed characteristics and gap acceptance behavior of pedestrians of Asian Countries: A review. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 27, 101199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2024.101199

Alam, H. K., H. M., A. M., & Legowo, S. J. (2015). Evaluasi tingkat pelayanan jembatan penyeberangan orang (Studi kasus jembatan penyeberangan Pasar Kartosuro Sukoharjo). Matriks Teknik Sipil, 3, 1183–1190.

Bhuiyan, M. A., Matsuyuki, M., & Tanaka, S. (2024). Comparative analysis of various pedestrian-crossing facilities on highways and the selection of a cost-effective facility by maximizing the benefit-cost ratio. Asian Transport Studies, 10, 100123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eastsj.2024.100123

Chen, Z., Chen, X., Wang, R., & Gao, M. (2022). Characterization of pedestrian crossing spatial violations and safety impact analysis in advance right-turn lane. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(15), 9134. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159134

Chauhan, S., Dave, S., Shah, J., & Kedia, A. (2024). Assessing traffic characteristics for safe pedestrian crossings: Developing warrants for sustainable urban safety. Sustainability, 16(10), 4182. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16104182

Department of Justice, & Department of Transportation. (n.d.). Guide to the ADA accessibility standards. U.S. Access Board. https://www.access-board.gov/files/ada/ADA-Standards.pdf

Direktorat Jenderal Bina Marga. (2023). Pedoman perencanaan teknis fasilitas pejalan kaki. Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat.

Federal Highway Administration. (n.d.). Human-centered roadway analysis and design. U.S. Department of Transportation. https://international.fhwa.dot.gov/humanfactors/chapter_six.cfm

Global Alliance of NGOs for Road Safety. (2023). Pedestrian facilities. https://www.roadsafetyngos.org/toolkit/priority-interventions/pedestrian-facilities/

Golakiya, H. D., & Dhamaniya, A. (2021). Development of pedestrian crossing facility warrants for urban midblock crosswalks based on vehicular delay. Transportation in Developing Economies, 7(2), 18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40890-021-00128-1

Hariani, M. L., Maharani Rifqi, P., & Septiani Ayunindita, A. (2024). The effectiveness of pedestrian crossing bridges for urban areas in Indonesia based on crossing times and pedestrian perspective. Asian Journal of Engineering, Social and Health, 3(9), 2020–2034. https://doi.org/10.46799/ajesh.v3i9.383

Hermawan, D., Setiyo Huboyo, H., & Putranto, T. T. (2023). Perencanaan kebutuhan fasilitas pejalan kaki pada area pendidikan Jalan Perjuangan Cirebon. Jurnal Profesi Insinyur Indonesia, 1(5), 169–175.

Idris, Z. (2007). Jembatan penyeberangan di depan kampus UMS sebagai fasilitas pejalan kaki. Dinamika Teknik Sipil, 7, 87–93.

Intari, D. E., Setiawati, D. N., & Eliany, M. (2019). Analisis kebutuhan fasilitas penyeberangan jalan di depan Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa Kota Serang. Jurnal Fondasi, 8(2).

ITDP (Institute for Transportation and Development Policy). (2024, February 29). Pedestrian bridges make cities less walkable. Why do cities keep building them? https://itdp.org/2024/02/29/pedestrian-bridges-make-cities-less-walkable-why-do-cities-keep-building-them/

Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat. (2017). Persyaratan kemudahan bangunan gedung. Kementerian PUPR.

Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat. (2018). Surat Edaran Menteri Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat Nomor 02/SE/M/2018 tentang Perencanaan Teknis Fasilitas Pejalan Kaki.

Kementerian Perhubungan Republik Indonesia. (2014). Peraturan Menteri Perhubungan Republik Indonesia Nomor PM 13 Tahun 2014 tentang Rambu Lalu Lintas.

Kementerian Perhubungan Republik Indonesia. (2018). Peraturan Menteri Perhubungan Republik Indonesia Nomor 47 Tahun 2018 tentang Marka Jalan.

Kurnia Alam, H., H. M., A. M., & Legowo, S. J. (2015). Evaluasi tingkat pelayanan jembatan penyeberangan orang (Studi kasus jembatan penyeberangan Pasar Kartosuro Sukoharjo). Matriks Teknik Sipil, 3, 1183–1190.

Kurniawan, S., Putra Pratama, H., & Maskyur. (2019). Analisis karakteristik penyeberangan pejalan kaki pada ruas Jalan Jenderal Sudirman Kota Metro. Tapak, 9(1), 2089–2098. http://u.lipi.go.id/1320332466

Malaiholo, D., Arliansyah, J., & Buchari, E. (2016). Analisis kebutuhan fasilitas pejalan kaki di kawasan Masjid Agung Kota Palembang. Jurnal Penelitian dan Kajian Teknik Sipil, 4, 1611–1618.

Manthirikul, S., Jain, U., & Amshala, V. T. (2022). A critical review of grade-separated pedestrian crossing facilities. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems, 148(10). https://doi.org/10.1061/JTEPBS.0000711

Manthirikul, S., Jain, U., & Marisamynathan, S. (2023). Pedestrian waiting delay at signalized midblock crosswalks under mixed traffic conditions. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems, 149(11). https://doi.org/10.1061/JTEPBS.TEENG-7541

Pattisinai, A. R., Fitri, A., & Widayanti, R. (2021). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kepuasan pengguna jembatan penyeberangan orang (JPO) pada pelayanan strategis berskala nasional di Kota Surabaya. Jurnal Manajemen Aset Infrastruktur & Fasilitas, 5(1).

Prayogi, F., Priyanto, S., & Muthohar, I. (2020). Analisis kinerja dan tingkat pelayanan fasilitas pejalan kaki di kawasan Stasiun Karet. Jurnal Transportasi, 25, 59–68.

Roeroe, M. I., Antow, D. T., & Mamesah, E. L. (2024). Perlindungan hukum terhadap pejalan kaki di area zebra cross. Lex Privatum, 16.

Sadeek, S. N., Rahman, M. H., & Rifaat, S. M. (2025). Understanding pedestrian bridge usage considering perception and socio-demographic characteristics of the road users in Dhaka city. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 31, 101384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2025.101384

Simanjuntak, M. B., Yulianto, & Rajaguguk, W. (2018). Studi efektifitas penggunaan jembatan penyeberangan orang (JPO) di kawasan Lapangan Merdeka Medan. Jurnal Arsitektur ALUR, 1, 22–30.

Tambunan, A. F. (2022). Efektivitas penggunaan jembatan penyeberangan orang (JPO) di Kota Sibolga. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Teknik, 2, 307–315.

Theofilatos, A., Ziakopoulos, A., Oviedo-Trespalacios, O., & Timmis, A. (2021). To cross or not to cross? Review and meta-analysis of pedestrian gap acceptance decisions at midblock street crossings. Journal of Transport & Health, 22, 101108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2021.101108

Widiyanti, D. (2016). Perencanaan desain fasilitas pejalan kaki di kawasan perkotaan di Kota Malang. Jurnal Penelitian Transportasi Darat, 18(2), 97–108.

Zareharofteh, F., & Eslami, M. (2021). Pedestrians’ outstanding beliefs regarding bridge use: A directed content analysis. Health Education and Health Promotion, 9, 127–134.

Zhang, Y., & Fricker, J. D. (2021). Investigating temporal variations in pedestrian crossing behavior at semi-controlled crosswalks: A Bayesian multilevel modeling approach. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 76, 92–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2020.11.002

Downloads

Published

2025-12-22

How to Cite

Analysis of Pedestrian Facility Planning (Case Study of Peta Street in Bandung City). (2025). ALTAIR: Jurnal Transportasi Dan Bahari, 2(2), 9-22. https://doi.org/10.62554/3zg7jf37

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)